Neither for or against the extension, but here is what I find extremely amusing --
the last coach kept losing more games each year he was here and people WANTED an extension. Wolf wins more games each year and people aren't FOR an extension, lol.
the previous coach, while a good DC, was a lousy HC who couldn't recruit at all and had sub-standard talent. Wolf, while supposedly a good OL coach, has been outstanding in bringing in better talent in recruiting, but has been killed by the D C.
the previous coach, while not a JT was an assist for JT and had the apologists crying for him. Wolf, never a JT assist., has no apologists .
the previous coach had good D teams and high school offenses that got embarrassing while Wolf has record breaking Os and a D that's plain awful.
the previous coach came nowhere near the playoffs before his extension while Wolf has just missed by one game for several years.
attendance fell with the previous coach while losing, yet even as Wolf wins more, attendance is flat or dropping
the previous coach ran the ball while Wolf lives by the pass.
the previous coach destroyed a Cadillac program while Wolf was handed a beat up junker.
The fair question is given the circumstances, who deserved an extension and who didn't, playoffs aside since neither made it when extensions handed out ?
Tale of Two Cities ?
lol